obsidian/🛡️ Debate/🗡️ Opponents/Anti-War Mindset.md

47 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2024-06-28 02:13:12 -05:00
# Debate 1
## Proposition
>"vegans kill more animals than non-vegans"
## Clarified Proposition
>"do you mean more animals die as a result of vegans making consumer choices as opposed to omnivores making consumer choices?"
## Questions
1. By this, do you mean more animals die as a result of vegans making consumer choices as opposed to omnivores making consumer choices?
1. answer: yes
2. Is this in absolute or relative terms?
1. answer: relative
3. What's the evidence that the proposition is true?
1. Required are empirics showing that more animals die when vegans make vegan consumer choices over omnivorous consumer choices, adjusted/truncated for biofuel and animal ag feed.
2. Statistics also need to be truncated to account for omnivores making consumer decisions consistent with veganism (such as buying bread).
## Evidence
- crop protection and production kills lots of animals
- there's a worldwide decline in insects and birds (via pesticides and habitat change)
- compatible with veganism causing fewer deaths in the long run
- human activity leads to insect and bird deaths in animal ag scenarios too
- pasture for grass-fed
- crops for grain-fed
- none of this is interesting because there are no comparative analyses of consumer choices and their subsequent effects on animal death
- the only information we know from this is that crop ag kills lots of animals
- insufficient to make the case that more animals die from vegan, rather than omnivore, choices
## Questions
- would alternatives to crop ag
## Argument
P1) If you kill off animals to extinction, then ecosystems will break down
P2) you kill off animals to extinction
C) therefore, ecosystems will break down
---
# Hashtags
#debate
#debate_opponents
#clowns
#clownery